Refunded after ten days. The core feature failed on my real data twice and support took four days to respond with a generic answer. For a tool that sells itself on reliability that is not good enough. Maybe revisit in a year.
MeridianNote
White-label reports your clients will open
Compare tiers
| Feature | Lite $79 | Plus $160 Most popular |
|---|---|---|
| Team seats | 50 | — |
| White-label | 50 | 200 |
| Custom domain | — | — |
| Proposals per month | ✓ | — |
| Active clients | ✓ | ✓ |
| Scheduled reports | — | 20000 |
| Client portal | — | ✓ |
About MeridianNote
MeridianNote is built for agencies who are tired of reporting that takes a day a month. It replaces the patchwork of spreadsheets, browser tabs and half-configured tools with one place that does the job and gets out of the way.
Setup takes about 11 minutes. Connect your existing accounts, import what you already have, and MeridianNote starts working against your real data the same afternoon. There is no onboarding call and no implementation fee.
What you get
Every tier includes the core workflow, unlimited exports, and email support with a stated response time. Higher tiers raise the usage limits and add team seats — the comparison table below shows exactly where the lines are drawn, so you can buy the smallest tier that fits and upgrade later if you outgrow it.
Lifetime deal terms
One-time payment of $79 to $160 for lifetime access. Codes are redeemed on the vendor's site using the instructions in your vault. 36-day refund window as stated at checkout.
What this does not do
There is no time tracking. It is not a project management tool — there are no Gantt charts or sprints.
Reviews · 8
raw 3.8
Weighted by recency, verified redemption, time owned and normalised helpfulness. The method.
Refunded after ten days. Performance degraded badly once I imported more than a few thousand records. The vendor says a fix is coming but I bought a tool, not a promise. Got the refund without fuss, which I will credit them for.
Redemption was fine; the product was not. The core feature failed on my real data twice and support took four days to respond with a generic answer. For a tool that sells itself on reliability that is not good enough. Maybe revisit in a year.